Wednesday, November 28, 2012

Information Silos

Except for the time in which the human population was so small that there were no divergent opinions (think Adam all alone in the Garden of Eden), there has never been an era in which there has not been some semblance of information siloing. In ages past, information silos existed because the barriers to sharing ideas were geographic.

As webs of interaction grew and geographic barriers fell, opportunities to share information and ideas grew. The silos remained because the interactions were infrequent. As interactions became more frequent, the hope was that information could be shared more frequently, people could learn the same things, and come to the same conclusions. However, lots of different people with different ideas were all working with the same thought on those different ideas. As a result, enclaves and groups with different philosophies grew up and were maintained within their information silos. 

In the present, information silos exist because there is too much information available. People have the ability to filter out and exclude information. Indeed they must do so in order to not become paralyzed through information overload. Observers & commentators frequently lament the existence of these information silos because they reinforce differences. But they also lament the fact that their competitors hold sway in their information silo, so do not have that audience over which to exercise influence, through which to gain more influence, and potentially make more money. And whatever you do, don't let them kid you. It's about the money.





Thursday, November 15, 2012

Work Together


Reviled Chaff-

            Pestilence informs me that his patient is feeling particularly bitter toward your minister. Were you aware of this? If you were, why didn’t you include it in your last report? If not, why not? Aren’t you communicating with your coworkers? You must all work together in order to have the greatest effect on your situation.
            I know what I am about to tell you cuts against every fiber of your being, but you must trust me. When I was a tempter, I was very successful. I know more about how to effectively thwart our enemy and torment souls than you do. If I didn’t I wouldn’t be a manager. And I had a manager over me then, too. He wasn’t as gifted as me, but he was useful. He did for me what I am trying to do for you. I am here to give you ideas for how to proceed that you might not have considered. I can tell you based upon my experience the best method of attack. Another mind working on the problem from a distance gives some objectivity and is able to draw on experiences you do not have. In the unlikely event we run into a big problem that I cannot handle, I can talk with other managers and even go to the superintendent for advice.
            As your superior I could order you to tell me everything that happens, but that would make your reports very tedious. Besides, you should be able to differentiate between what is useful to our cause and what is not. If you demonstrate that you cannot I will have to request a different tempter take your place so that you can return to your last job in the pit. Your file says you were very effective there, which is what allowed you to move up. Still, you would not be the first who was promoted beyond his ability.
            Regardless, I believe you are capable and I assure you that I seek nothing more than your success. So be sure to communicate with your fellows, include useful information in your reports, and remember that you need not fear me. I am here to support you and help you succeed.
            Now, about your minister. Pestilence’s patient believes she finds nothing wrong with homosexuality. Is it true? Does she believe homosexuals are worthy of full inclusion in the church, just as heterosexuals are? This could be dangerous to us. As I told Pestilence, do not proceed with any attack on this issue until we are certain where your charge stands. We must let the animosity and confusion rest for now so that it can do its work.
            This could be very beneficial for us down the road, of course. Human sexuality is one of the great mysteries and is so easily perverted. Fortunately the humans do not understand sexuality either. Even our most experienced investigators have been unable to understand it. What would motivate the enemy to create anything that forces you to give up what is yours? Why would anyone share power? Why would he have filled such a puerile action with sensations that give humans such pleasure? And why were these pleasures given to these lower creatures and not to us as well? Do we not also seek pleasure? I believe this may be a sign that the enemy does not care for the things he made, just as the Evil One says. Why else would he withhold the things that we want from us?
            Regardless, human sexuality has always been something we can use to our advantage. We can pervert it into pain, shame, guilt, fear and inferiority to name just a few of the useful emotions it can bring out. And as our lord tells us, he is the one who twisted the world so that at least some people would disdain members of the opposite sex in favor of the same sex, preventing the birth of more children. How the humans respond to one another on this issue is very entertaining. Sex has done more to ensure we receive souls than any other temptation. In more ways that one! It is probably our enemy’s greatest mistake.
            For now, though, it is best if your minister does not mention sexuality at all. Give Pestilence some time to further harden his charge’s position while beginning to form a faction of people who can oppose the minister openly. As I said before, your operating principle must be to keep them from communicating with one another openly. The longer these divisive feelings are hidden from your minister and the embittered pew-sitter, the greater the effect that can result. So give it time. But do be sure to find out what she believes.

In agony,
Dross

Saturday, November 10, 2012

Gender and Loneliness


Reviled Chaff,

            You are half right. That your minister is female can be an advantage to our cause, but it can also be a tremendous danger. Humans have always valued men over women, so for her to be a success, she must be more talented, more disciplined, and more determined than a man.
            They talk about the equality of the sexes, but women invariably work against barriers men don’t face. As though plumbing were so important. Any weak body possessed by one of our own has tremendous strength. Should this minister stay in contact with our enemy, she can be tremendously dangerous. You could lose the entire population if you are not careful.
            Use the minister’s gender against her. Tell her that the only reason she got this church is because it is a backwater. Remind her that had any man wanted the post, the congregation would undoubtedly have preferred him. And while we are on the subject of “him” remind her that she is a single woman. If she were desirable, attractive, witty enough, etc., etc., she would have a man of her own. Insinuate that she would also have a child of her own if our enemy cared about her. But clearly he doesn’t love her because if he did, she would not be so lonely.
            Be careful to not let this engender pity for the girl. Pity can lead to compassion, a detestable emotion, which promotes sharing and giving. But if she does start to seem pitiable, push her to being pitiful. As she becomes maudlin and overly dramatic the people will withdraw from her. The weaker the relationships she has with the community, the less effect she will have on it. Eventually she will despair and you will have won. Your congregation will realize they are beyond help, that our enemy will never provide them with a competent minister because they are unworthy.
            Here is the plan you should follow. Instill in her a desire to be a savior. Create the illusion that this is the expectation that the congregation has for her. If this is the expectation the congregation has of her, so much the better. Just don’t let them name it. Keep it under the surface. Let it be expressed in statements of comparison with prior pastors from ages ago. Encourage looks of disappointment, but again, don’t let them talk about these things. The moment they start discussing these things, you will have lost your advantage.
            As these expectations work on her, your minister will feel as though she must study more so as to provide better instruction, give the proper answer, etc. Encourage her in this. The more she is shut away in her study, the less likely she is to create relationships. Somehow they gain strength by pouring energy into another person. Such an abnormal activity, and truly frightening! Far more natural to suck energy out of another.
            Regardless, you must also be careful with what she studies. Get her into psychology, politics, economics, or any other work. Keep her as far from the unnameable book as you can. If she must look in it, encourage her to look for proof texts so as to prove her point. Don’t let her draw a point from the text. That will be deadly. Be strong in your efforts, but again, be cunning and subtle.

In agony,
Dross

Friday, November 9, 2012

The Practical Implications of Hermeneutical Lenses

What a person believes is much more important than what a person knows. People approach whatever scriptures they read (the Bible, Quran, Vedas, On the Origin of Species etc.) with hermeneutical lenses already in place. The words people read are understood in light of their innate, natural temperaments and their received, nurtured experiences. Therefore we are all predisposed by what we already understand and believe to come to an interpretation of scripture that is in line with our beliefs. As such the eyeglasses through which we view scripture are equally as important as -- if not more important than -- the scriptures we read.

This postmodern insight confirms that when we approach scripture predisposed to believe that its words are the literal, inerrant, historical and scientific record of God's work in the world, we will leave it believing that scientific discoveries and insights which point in opposite directions are at best in error. At worst we will believe they are deceptions propagated by evil forces, which are in control of those scientists. The implications for human life in the present and future are immense.

Belief necessarily constrains our ability to receive knowledge. For example, the evidence of global warming is ridiculous to those who see an immanent arrival or return of the Messiah on the horizon. Or again, evidence that Jesus lived, and died fits with human experience. We know that people live and die. The testimony of witnesses to Jesus moving among them in the flesh after his death just does not fit. In both cases, the inability to accept the logical testimony of those who say that Jesus rose from the dead, or that the world is warming and human activity is the only logical explanation is not because people are stupid, ignorant, or even uncaring. The issue is the orientating belief structure.

Unless and until people are able to see the lenses through which they view the world, be they theistic or atheistic, scientific or unscientific, they will take sides in the mis-named culture war rather than pursue the truths each "side" knows. Theists will continue to ignore rising temperatures, retreating glaciers, and more devastating natural disasters, while atheists will continue to die without Christ.

Thursday, November 8, 2012

A Station Change


Reviled Chaff-

It was with grave joy that I learned that you and your case had been assigned to me. As I understand it, the previous tempter squandered the years of effort made by demons far more terrible than either of us. He was removed, of course. 
Now, I relish most forms of danger, but the danger we now face nearly defies comprehension. How could that worthless creature have let the people on your new station decide to bring in one of our enemy’s ministers? Didn't he see the warning signs? Undoubtedly not. Most likely he mistook an aspiration for something greater in the minds of those humans as a lack of contentment. He probably even flamed it, assuming that it would lead to wicked ends. I would call him fool, but I do not want to disparage those fools who do well at their craft.
You, however are receiving a great opportunity. As you properly apply the weapons at our disposal we might gain an advantage and return the situation to its natural state of futility. Of course, reinforcements are being reassigned as well, but your direct task is to assail the minister himself. Should you do well your promotion to a role like mine would be next. Stay focused and this can be yours.
I know nothing of your minister so in your next report you must tell me everything you can about him. In this way we can plan our attack more carefully and ensure our success. Since humans are very like us the minister will undoubtedly feel pride at his position. Play upon it. Kindle his pride until it burns like vanity. Once vanity is burning within him, transform it into conceit. Conceit will set his tongue on fire as our enemy knows only too well. Why he gave those lower beings the ability to communicate, placing within their bodies one of our greatest weapons is indeed a mystery. Since it is so easily turned to evil, use it. Let his vanity and conceit produce thoughtless and careless talk. In so doing you will cause hurts to develop, which will drive a wedge between him and the mindless fools who follow.
Use those hurts carefully, however. Do not just let the hurt alone. Help it become a festering wound. If a hurt between two people is not allowed to fester and properly scar, it will only draw the aptly named sheep into a more trusting relationship with their shepherd. When they determine that they must speak about their hurts, as they surely will, let them bleat to one another. They must be made to feel that the minister is not one of them. Keep him an outsider. Highlight what is different about him.
Finally let me remind you of what reflection upon your predecessors errors should have taught you. Moving forward you must be both cunning and subtle. Subtlety alone allows one of our adversary’s angels to turn your evil impulses for good. Cunning is critical. Use it shrewdly and twist aspirations into unreasonable, unattainable desires. Then you will make their hearts sick and more readily distract them with empty pleasures. Do well in this and we will win more souls to our dark feast.

With despair,
Dross

Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Freedom and Predestination

To be as committed as Americans are to "freedom" and "individualism" while simultaneously being committed to the Christian ideal that everything is predestined by God is quite irrational.

That is all.